Actions

HacDC Wiki talk

Cleanup 2012: Difference between revisions

From HacDC Wiki

m (→‎Dealing with old pages: properly wikilinking to category page)
Line 10: Line 10:
== Dealing with old pages ==
== Dealing with old pages ==


So from what I understand, we're going to go around labeling pages that are outdated with category tags [[Category:Proposed Projects|category example]], with one category for pages that should be updated and another category for pages that should be removed?
So from what I understand, we're going to go around labeling pages that are outdated with category tags ([[:Category:Proposed Projects|category example]]), with one category for pages that should be updated and another category for pages that should be removed?


And then we'll update the former and blank the latter?
And then we'll update the former and blank the latter?

Revision as of 16:32, 29 March 2012

This is a talk page! It's where talking happens!

Create a new section by clicking the "+" tab above. Think of sections like forum threads. Make a new one for each topic or idea.

Example section

I'm talking about a particular topic here! Look at me go! Remember to sign your posts by ending them with four tildes: "~~~~" NickS 17:37, 28 March 2012 (PDT)

Dealing with old pages

So from what I understand, we're going to go around labeling pages that are outdated with category tags (category example), with one category for pages that should be updated and another category for pages that should be removed?

And then we'll update the former and blank the latter?

NickS 19:57, 28 March 2012 (PDT)

Getting user IP addresses

Another idea: do we have the CheckUser extension installed?

Because there's like a dozen users being registered every day here, obviously for some kind of spamming purpose, all of which follow the same pattern: FirstnameLastname[three digits]. And the CheckUser extension allows us to give administrators the ability to see the IP addresses used by registered users. I thought it'd help investigating this phenomenon.

As a more longterm project, maybe we could reject any registration of a username fitting that pattern (two camelcase words followed by three digits (m/([A-Z][a-z]){2}\d{3}/)). For legit users, we can just tell them that because of spam problems they'll have to choose another name.

NickS 09:29, 29 March 2012 (PDT)