Communications Policy: Difference between revisions
From HacDC Wiki
(New page: irc channel should perhaps be mentioned on front page? --phf) |
(→project mailing lists: new section) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
irc channel should perhaps be mentioned on front page? --phf | irc channel should perhaps be mentioned on front page? --phf | ||
Front page of the Wiki or front page of hacdc.org? Either way, it's a good call. --[[User:Nickfarr|Nickfarr]] 15:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
i was thinking along the lines of "dynamic content" on the front page. along with the email. this way people will know how to get in touch with the team, without reading all the posts --phf | |||
I agree too. So, who can make this update? - [[User:Katie|Katie]] 18:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== project mailing lists == | |||
Right now the statement, "Each ongoing project must have an e-mail address associated with it" isn't being enforced. Do we want to reconsider that policy? Or start enforcing it? [[User:Katie|Katie]] 01:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:56, 21 November 2008
irc channel should perhaps be mentioned on front page? --phf
Front page of the Wiki or front page of hacdc.org? Either way, it's a good call. --Nickfarr 15:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
i was thinking along the lines of "dynamic content" on the front page. along with the email. this way people will know how to get in touch with the team, without reading all the posts --phf
I agree too. So, who can make this update? - Katie 18:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
project mailing lists
Right now the statement, "Each ongoing project must have an e-mail address associated with it" isn't being enforced. Do we want to reconsider that policy? Or start enforcing it? Katie 01:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)